| The Legitimacy of Using Prayer Beads (Subḥa) |
|
|
|
| Fiqh: Islamic Jurisprudence - Salah |
| Written by Various Scholars |
|
By Arsalan Haque — A short but thorough treatise showing the permissibility of using prayer beads. (Yet it is superior to use one’s fingers, as this was the practice of the Prophet (saw)) —
Prophetic Reports
1. A female Companion from the Emigrants by the name of Yusayra, may Allah be pleased with her, reported that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, “Hold fast to tahlīl (saying lā ilāha illallāh), tasbīḥ (saying subḥān Allāh), and taqdīs (saying subḥan al-malik al-quddūs, or subbūḥun quddūs). Do not fall into heedlessness, or else you shall not be shown Mercy. And count dhikr using your fingers, for verily they will be questioned and made to speak (on the Day of Judgment).” [i] This report was declared ṣaḥīḥ by Suyūṭī, Hākim and Dhahabī, and ḥasan by Nawawī and Ibn Ḥajar al-`Asqalānī. 2. Sa`d b. Abu Waqqāṣ, may Allah be pleased with him, reported that he came with the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, to a woman who had some seeds or pebbles in front of her that she was using to count tasbīḥ (i.e. dhikr). The Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, “I will tell you something that is easier or better for you than this. (Say:) Subḥān Allāhi `adada mā khalaqa fī al-samā’i, wa subḥān Allāhi `adada mā khalaqa fī al-arḍi, wa subḥān Allāhi `adada mā bayna dhālika, wa subḥān Allāhi `adada mā huwa khāliq. Then say the same (replacing subḥān Allāh) with Allāhu akbar, then alḥamdulillāh, then lā ilāha illallāh, and finally lā ḥawla walā quwwata illā billāh.” [ii] This report was declared ṣahīh by Ḥākim, with whom Dhahabī agreed, and ḥasan gharīb by Tirmidhī. 3. Ṣafiyya, may Allah be pleased with her, reported, “The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, came to me while there lay in front of me 4,000 seeds that I was using to count tasbīḥ (i.e. dhikr). He said, ‘You were using these for tasbīḥ? Should I teach you something that amounts to more than your tasbīḥ?’ I replied, ‘Yes!’ He said, ‘Say: Subḥān Allāhi `adada khalqihi.’” [iii] This report was declared ṣaḥīh by Ṣuyūṭī and Ḥākim, with whom Dhahabī agreed, and ḥasan by Ibn Ḥajar al-`Asqalānī. Analyzing the Reports [iv]
The first report sanctions the use of one’s fingers for counting dhikr. The Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, indicated that the reason for this was because they will be questioned and made to speak, i.e. testify, on the Day of Judgment. From this perspective, using one’s fingers is superior to using prayer beads or pebbles. The second and third reports, however, show that it is permissible to use seeds and pebbles to count one’s dhikr. The same would apply to prayer beads by analogy, because there is no significant difference [fāriq] between them. Their use is permissible because of the Prophet’s tacit approval of the women in both reports, and the fact that he did not censure them for what they were doing. As for the fact that he pointed out something that was superior, doing so does not negate the permissibility of what they were doing.
Practice of the Companions [v]
There are a number of reports that show that the Companions, may Allah be pleased with them, used to count dhikr using pebbles. The following are some of them:
Testimonies of Various Scholars
The Opposing View
Shaykh Muḥammad Nāṣir al-Dīn al-Albānī said, “Prayer beads are an innovation [bid`ah]. They did not exist during the time of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, but invented later … They contravene the Prophetic guidance, as `Abdullah b. `Amr said, ‘I saw the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, use his right hand to count dhikr.’ [x] … They also contravene the Prophetic command, as he said to one of his wives, ‘Count tasbīḥ using your fingers, for verily they will be questioned and made to speak (on the Day of Judgment).’ [xi] … If there was only one evil in prayer beads, it would suffice: namely that they have totally – or almost – replaced the sunnah of counting with one’s fingers, which is superior by their own agreement …” [xii] He also said after citing the reports about counting dhikr using one’s fingers, “This is the sunnah for counting those adhkār whose count is sanctioned by Sacred Law – to count them on one’s hand, and only the right hand. Counting on one’s left hand, or both hands, or pebbles, all of that is against the Prophetic way [sunnah]. There is nothing authentically reported about the use of pebbles to count dhikr, let alone prayer beads.” [xiii]
Conclusion
Shaykh Albānī’s opinion notwithstanding, the majority of Muslim scholars deem the use of prayer beads as permissible. Yet it is superior to use one’s fingers, as this was the practice of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, especially when counting smaller iterations, such as the following after each obligatory prayer:
As for larger iterations that are difficult to count using one’s fingers, such as the adhkār mentioned in the reports below, one may rely on prayer beads to ensure accuracy:
Finally, if one chooses to follow the opinion that deems the use prayer beads as forbidden, one is free to do so. However, it is not permissible to condemn others who wish to make use of prayer beads, as the legal axiom states – It is not permissible to censure an act about which there is legitimate disagreement amongst Muslim scholars. And Allah most certainly knows best. [i] Related by Aḥmad in his Musnad, Tirmidhī in Sunan, Abu Dawūd in his Sunan, and Ḥākim in his Mustadrak. [ii] Related by Abū Dawūd in his Sunan, Tirmidhī in his Sunan, al-Nasā’ī in his `Amal al-Yawmi wa al-Layla, Ibn Māja in his Sunan, Ibn Ḥibbān in his Ṣaḥīḥ, and Ḥākim in his Mustadrak. [iii] Related by Tirmidhī in his Sunan, and Ḥākim in his Mustadrak. [iv] Shawkānī, Nayl al-Awṭ̣ār, 4:115. [v] Ibid., 4:115-116. [vi] Ibid., 4:116. [vii] Ibn Taymiyya, Majmū` al-Fatāwā, 22:506 [viii] Fatāwā al-Lajna al-Dā’ima, 24:269 [ix] Ibn `Uthaymīn, Majmū` Fatāwā wa Rasā’il Ibn `Uthaymīn, 13:173 [x] Related by Abū Dāwūd and Tirmidhī in their Sunans, Ibn Ḥibbān in his Saḥīḥ, and Ḥākim in his Mustadrak; it was declared ḥasan by Tirmidhī, and ṣaḥīḥ by Dhahabī [xi] See note i above [xii] Albānī, Silsila al-Aḥādīth al-Da`īfa, 1:83 [xiii] Ibid., 3:1 [xiv] Related by Bukhārī in his Saḥīḥ [xv] Related by Bukhārī and Muslim in their Saḥīḥs [xvi] Related by Bukhārī in his Saḥīḥ [xvii] Related by Muslim in his Saḥīḥ |



